Mooring

Mooring v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department

Good Law
289 F. Supp. 2d 1110·2003 WL 22519399·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19802
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2003C 03-065 SI(PR)California5,121 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

Daniel Mooring, an inmate currently housed at the San Francisco County Jail, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Defendant now moves for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedies, and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs deliberate indifference claim and on the defense of qualified immunity. For the reasons discussed below, the court concludes that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs complaint and on his defense of qualified immunity. Accordingly, the court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

This civil rights action concerns an incident that occurred on May 23, 2002, when Daniel Mooring allegedly was housed unwillingly with gang rivals and was shortly thereafter assaulted by them. The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted.

On May 23, 2002, Mooring was incarcerated at the San Francisco County Jail as a pretrial detainee. The lone remaining defendant, Rene Gonzalez, was a San Francisco County Sheriffs deputy working in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.