Hirel Connectors, Inc. v. United States

Good Law
465 F. Supp. 2d 984·2005 WL 4942595·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44171
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2005CV0111069DSFVBKXCalifornia4,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fischer, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

I. INTRODUCTION

By this Motion (one of seven filed concurrently), Defendants contend Plaintiffs misappropriation claims are barred by the statute of limitations.

Defendants’ Joint Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Declaration of Jack Smart with Exhibits in Support Thereof (“Smart Dec.”); Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations (“SOUF”); (Proposed) Order Granting Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations, and [Pro posed] Judgment were filed on September 28, 2004.

The Notice of Errata Regarding Table of Contents and Table of Authorities as to Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations was filed on September 29, 2004.

Plaintiff HiRel Connectors’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Statute of Limitations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.