Walker & Zanger, Inc. v. Paragon Industries, Inc.

Good Law
465 F. Supp. 2d 956·2006 WL 3490975·348 Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) 29330·84 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1981·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87261
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 2006C-04-1946 VRWCalifornia7,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walker, J.

ORDER

Walker & Zanger, Inc filed this action May 18, 2004, against Paragon Industries, Inc, alleging a variety of claims under the Lanham Act, the Copyright Act, state unfair competition law and state false advertising law. Compl. (Doc. # 1).

Defendant moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims and moves to strike surveys performed by plaintiffs expert Dr. Henry Ostberg. Doc. ## 82, 87. Plaintiff moves to exclude testimony of defendant’s expert Travis Culwell. Doc. # 107. For reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendant’s motion for summary judgment, DENIES defendant’s motion to strike and DENIES plaintiffs motion to exclude testimony.

I

Plaintiff is a producer of high quality stone and ceramic decorative tiles and tile collections for use in a variety of settings. Doc. #111, Ex. B at 12:16-25, 13:1-15 (Overend deck). Plaintiffs tiles are nationally marketed in several series, or lines, each of which is devoted to a particular artistic concept, such as a line exemplifying a French provengal theme. Overend deck, Ex. G. The tile lines at issue in this case are the Avignon and Newport lines, which were first promoted in approximately August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.