Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.

Good Law
249 F.2d 246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 195715057California7,136 words

Opinion

Opinion

249 F.2d 246 MOIST COLD REFRIGERATOR CO., Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. LOU JOHNSON CO., Inc., a Corporation; Meier & Frank Company, Inc., a Corporation; Admiral Corporation, a Corporation; and Amana Refrigeration, Inc., a Corporation, Appellees. No. 15057. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 17, 1957. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1957. Buckhorn, Cheatham & Blore, Orme E. Cheatham, Hugh L. Biggs, Portland, Or., Davis, Hoxie & Faithfull, John B. Cunningham, T. Roland Berner, Aaron Lewittes, New York City, for appellant. Ramsey & Kilisch, W. E. Ramsey, J. Pierre Kolisch, Portland, Or., Wilkinson, Huxley, Byron & Hume, Charles L. Byron, William E. Lucas, Francis H. Uriell, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, Chief Judge, BARNES, Circuit Judge, and LINDBERG, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge. 1 This is an action for damages for patent infringement of Reissue Patent No. 23,058. 1 It was tried in the District Court with a jury. Prior to the trial, Lou Johnson Co. and Meier & Frank Co., both corporations, were eliminated as defendants. 2 The remaining defendants moved for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.