Kaisha

Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Burlington & Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.

Good Law
367 F. Supp. 2d 1292·2005 WL 1006201·2005 A.M.C. 1711·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7203
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 8, 2005CV 03-6523GAFRZXCalifornia5,821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feess, J.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Nippon Yusen Kaisha (“NYK”) is an ocean carrier that ships cargo on marine vessels all over the world. NYK was hired by Matsushita, the parent company of Panasonic, to move various electronics from Japan to Texas. NYK subcontracted with Defendant Burlington & Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. (“BNSF”) for rail transportation for the California to Texas leg of the journey. The BNSF train crashed en route damaging the Matsushita cargo. In this suit, NYK seeks to recover from BNSF the approximately $387,000 it was forced to pay to Matsushita for the damaged cargo pursuant to the terms of the waybill. The question of whether BNSF is required to shoulder these costs is complicated by a series of federal statutes and regulations governing railroads.

Now before the Court is BNSF’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs complaint alleges six causes of action — five under common law and one under the federal Carmack Amendment. The Court finds that all five common law claims are preempted by the Carmack Amendment but that Plaintiffs cause of action under the Carmack Amendment survives.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.