Luna

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the court on remaining defendant Border Patrol agent Steven St. Pierre’s (“St. Pierre”) Post-Discovery Motion For Summary Judgment (“Motion”) in this Bivens personal injury action, proceeding under a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Prior Orders in this case have disposed of all but one of the FAC claims and all other defendants. Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez Luna (“Luna”) filed Opposition to the Motion, and St. Pierre filed a Reply, accompanied by a Motion To Strike. Luna filed Opposition to the Motion To Strike, and St. Pierre filed a Reply to that Opposition. The court finds the issues presented appropri ate for decision on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s Motion To Strike is GRANTED, and his Motion For Summary-Judgment is GRANTED, disposing of all remaining parties and claims in this action.

I. BACKGROUND

This court’s Standing Order In Civil Cases instructs that only one joint statement of undisputed facts, signed by all parties, shall be filed in connection with motions…