Barker-Hatch

Barker-Hatch v. Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of Viejas Group Reservation

Good Law
83 F. Supp. 2d 1155·2000 WL 149240·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4154
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 200099 CV 1730BTM(LSP)California1,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moskowitz, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant, the Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of the Viejas Group Reservation (“Viejas Group”), moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ suit for damages sustained when Jacquelin Barker-Hatch slipped and fell on a wet walkway on defendant’s property. Defendant argues that, as a federally-recognized Indian tribe, it is immune from suit under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. For the reasons expressed below, the Court need not reach the issue of sovereign immunity because it lacks subject matter to resolve the dispute.

It is axiomatic that federal judicial power extends only to cases and controversies over which a court has subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 , 114 S.Ct. 1673 , 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994). Although neither of the parties broached the issue of subject matter jurisdiction, it is incumbent on the Court to address this threshold question. See National Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433 (9th Cir.1997). Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that, at the time of the incident, they were residents of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.