Airtouch Cellular v. City of El Cajon

Good Law
83 F. Supp. 2d 1158·2000 WL 194312·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4158
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2000Civ. 99-1801-B LABCalifornia6,951 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER

(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: FIRST AND SIXTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

I. Introduction

Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment re: First and Sixth Claims for Relief, and (2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication of Issues.

II. Background

The zoning ordinances of the City of El Cajon (hereinafter “City”) permit cellular antennas in any zone provided a conditional use permit is granted. (Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), Ex. D, El Cajon Zoning Ordinance § 17.60.040(Y).) On December 21, 1998, Plaintiff AirTouch Cellular (“AirTouch” or “Plaintiff’) filed with the City Application No. 1773 for a conditional use permit (“CUP”) to construct and maintain wireless communication facilities on top of and adjacent to a water tower owned by the Padre Dam Municipal Water District. (Administrative Record (“AR”), Ex. 57.) The water tower is in the Fletcher Hills area of the City in an “R-S-9-H” (Residential Suburban, 9000 sq. ft.) zone. (AR at Ex. 47, 499.) AirTouch sought to build an unmanned facility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.