Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
405 F. Supp. 2d 1141·2005 WL 3497803·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39928
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 2005SA CV04-0358 DOC PJWCalifornia9,282 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS EQUIFAX AND TRANS UNION’S MOTION TO DISMISS NON-RESIDENT PLAINTIFFS’ UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS IN COUNT Y; DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IV; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I AND THE NCRA’S CLAIMS, AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF COUNT V; GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT III

Before the Court are motions to dismiss, a motion to strike, and a motion for summary judgment concerning Plaintiffs’ Third Amended and Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Robinson-Patman Act, and State Law (“TAC”). Specifically, the following motions are before the Court: (1) Defendants Equifax Inc. (“Equifax”) and Trans Union LLC’s (“Trans Union”) motion to dismiss Count V of the TAC brought by non-resident Plaintiffs under California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”); (2) Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s (“Experian”) motion to dismiss Count IV, a claim under California’s Unfair Practices Act; (3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss Count I (Sherman Act § 2) and all claims by Plaintiff National Credit Reporting Agency’s (“NCRA”) and motion to strike paragraph 124 in Count V;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.