Albert Edward Deutschmann v. United States

Good Law
254 F.2d 487·1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4036
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 195815774California1,878 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Appellant was charged in a five count indictment with various violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 — illegal trafficking in narcotics. *He pleaded guilty to counts 1 and 3 of the indictment. On June 17, 1957 appellant was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment on count 1; and consecutive thereto five years probation on count 3; imposition of sentence on count 3 being suspended. Counts 2, 4 and 5 were dismissed. Appellant was committed to the custody of the Marshal to commence sentence and was held in the county jail awaiting transportation to a federal penitentiary.

On the next day, June 18, 1957 appellant was recalled to court, the original sentence as to count 3 vacated as illegal, and a new sentence imposed: fifteen years on each count to run consecutively. The illegality of the original sentence as to count 3 arose because 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 , by incorporation of 26 U.S.C. § 7237 (d), in its 1956 amendment, prohibits the court from suspending imposition of sentence or granting probation.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal charging that the vacating and resentencing were illegal in that such procedure increased his punishment after he had already begun to serve his sentence, thereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.