Special Devices, Inc. v. OEA, INC.

Good Law
117 F. Supp. 2d 989·2000 WL 1577082·56 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1627·2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16509
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 2000CV 99-03861 DT SHXCalifornia3,937 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tevrizian, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF SPECIAL DEVICES, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,404,263 UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b)

I. Background

A. Factual Summary

This action is brought by Plaintiff Special Devices, Inc. (“Special Devices”) against OEA, Inc. (“OEA”) for declaratory relief of patent invalidity and non-infringement under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Before this Court is Special Device’s motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 5,404,263 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b).

The following relevant facts are not disputed:

The subject matter of United States Patent No. 5,404,263 (“the ’263 patent”) is an all-glass header used in air-bag initiators, the small device that sets off, or “initiates,” the explosion that results in the expansion of a vehicle’s air bag.

The ’263 patent includes 24 claims. Claims 1-9 are “device” claims and each reads directly on the header shown in Figure 3 of the ’263 patent. Claim 1 is an independent claim and claims 2-9 depend directly or indirectly from claim 1 and add only minor limitations to claim 1. Claims 10-24 are “method claims” directed to the method of making an all-glass…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.