Soghomonian

Soghomonian v. United States

Good Law
278 F. Supp. 2d 1151·2003 WL 22006246·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19856
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2003CV F 99-5773 AWU DKBCalifornia13,026 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ishii, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

In this case, plaintiffs are Raffi Sogho-monian (“Raffi”) and Deborah Garabedian (“Deborah”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). They have sued defendants the United States and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) (collectively “Defendants”).

The only remaining defendant in this action, Trans Union, has moved for summary judgment on the only remaining claim — Plaintiffs eighth claim for relief against Trans Union under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. section 1681 et seq. Hearing on Trans Union’s motion was previously set for June 9, 2003. By order filed June 3, 2003, the court vacated the hearing on Trans Union’s motion for summary judgment and took the matter under submission as of that date. See L.R. 78-230(h).

For the reasons set forth below the court now issues this order denying Trans Union’s motion in its entirety.

DISCUSSION

The facts and procedural background of this case, as well as the parties’ arguments in connection with the present motion, are well known to the parties and to the court. They will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.