Robey
Robey v. Shapiro, Marianos & Cejda, L.L.C.
Opinion
Opinion
Aguilar, J.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss filed September 23, 2002 (Docket Entry Nos. 11 and 12). Also coming on for consideration is Plaintiffs Application to Supplement Plaintiffs Response to Motions for Summary Judgment (sic) filed January 15, 2003 (Docket Entry # 20). All of these motions are at issue. Upon review and consideration of these documents, this Court renders this ruling.
As an initial matter, this Court has considered Plaintiffs request to supplement his response by including various documents from an unrelated foreclosure action filed in the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs requested supplementation of the record does nothing to further the resolution of the pending motions; indeed, the inclusion of these irrelevant documents only serves to clutter an already cumbersome record. Therefore, the request -will be denied.
On July 23, 2002, Plaintiff initiated this potential class action, filing a First Amended Complaint on August 28, 2002. In this action, Plaintiff contends Defendant Shapiro, Marianos & Cejda, LLC, a law firm, and the individual attorneys in that firm, Theresa Marianos, Kirk Cejda and…