Cyntegra, Inc. v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
520 F. Supp. 2d 1199·2007 WL 3197052·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79856
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2007CV 06-4170 PSG (CTx)California5,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gutierrez, J.

Proceedings: In Chambers Order GRANTING Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Idexx Laboratories, Inc.’s (“Idexx” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. After considering the parties’ papers and oral argument at the hearing" on October 22, 2007, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.

1. BACKGROUND

Defendant develops and sells a variety of products used by veterinarians to diagnose and treat illnesses in companion animals, including analyzers used to test specimens in-clinic, pharmaceuticals and reference laboratory services. (Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, “UF,” UF, ¶¶ 2, 4-6.) Defendant’s in-clinic rapid assay tests, or SNAP® tests, allow veterinarians to test the animals and receive results while the animals and their owners are present at the appointment. (UF, ¶¶ 5-7.) Defendant also offers diagnostic services through Idexx Reference Laboratories, a worldwide network of laboratories. (UF, ¶ 8.) These laboratories send collection kits directly to veterinarians, who collect samples and submit them back to Defendant for analyses. (UF, ¶¶ 10-11.)

Plaintiff Cyntegra, Inc. (“Cyntegra”) claims it has developed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.