Runnels

Williams v. Runnels

Good Law
640 F. Supp. 2d 1203·2009 WL 2381756·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67944
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2009CV-01-3301-SVW (JWJ)California8,669 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

ORDER ADOPTING THIRD SUPERSEDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the instant First Amended Petition along with the attached Third Superseding Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Third Superseding Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered granting Petitioner a conditional writ of habeas corpus and discharging Petitioner from custody and all adverse consequences of his conviction in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. TA048776, unless Petitioner is brought to retrial within ninety (90) days of the date this Judgment becomes final, plus any additional delay authorized under State law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy of this

Order and the Judgment of this date on counsel for Petitioner and Respondent.

THIRD SUPERSEDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Third Superseding Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.