Perkins

Perkins v. Allstate Insurance

Good Law
63 F. Supp. 2d 1164·1999 WL 669458
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 1999CV 98-9629 AHMCalifornia6,449 words

Opinion

Opinion

Matz, J.

ORDER DENYING THE ALLSTATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This is an action seeking insurance coverage for injuries Plaintiff sustained in an automobile accident. On October 22, 1998, Plaintiff filed her complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Allstate Insurance Co., Allstate Indemnity Co. (collectively referred to as “Allstate”), Rex L. Barnett and Karen Bonneau. The complaint alleges two causes of action: (1) Breach of Contract (insofar as Allstate failed to defend its insured); and (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (based upon Allstate’s alleged' wrongful refusal to settle and defend the underlying action against its insured).

This matter is currently before the Court on Allstate’s motion for summary judgment. The Court has reviewed the papers submitted, the file in this case and oral argument of counsel. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court denies Allstate’s motion.

I.

PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On December 1, 1998, Allstate removed this case on diversity grounds, arguing that the California citizenship of Defendants Barnett and Bonneau should be disregarded because Plaintiff cannot establish liability against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.