Jordan

Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corp. Welfare Benefit Plan

Good Law
63 F. Supp. 2d 1145·1999 WL 710096·1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15955
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 15, 1999CV98-3726ABC(JGX)California9,545 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing before this Court on June 14, 1999, and was taken under submission following oral argument. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff VICKI JORDAN (“Plaintiff’) filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B) (“ERISA”) against Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Compa ny (“MetLife”) and Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan (collectively “Defendants”) for -wrongful denial of long-term disability benefits. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs claim for disability benefits.

The Court reviews this case based on the following undisputed facts:

A. Plaintiffs Background

Plaintiff worked as a Senior Administrative Secretary for Northrop Grumman from August 20, 1984 until. May 17, 1995. Pl.’s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (“Pl.’s Fact”) 1. Plaintiffs job required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.