Andrews

Mitchell v. Andrews

Good Law
235 F. Supp. 2d 1085·2001 WL 34051840·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25095
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2001CVF995551OWWHGBPCalifornia2,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#30)

Petitioner, a federal prisoner, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On May 15, 2000, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen (15) days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 15, 2000, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED and this case is remanded to the Bureau of Prisons for reconsideration of petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.