Garber

A. Farber and Partners, Inc. v. Garber

Good Law
417 F. Supp. 2d 1143·2006 WL 538286·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12148
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2006CV 05-2776-JFW(RCX)California2,181 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS

On January 20, 2006, defendants Maynard “Chuck” Garber, the Chuck Garber 2003 Trust, Armi Garber, Daniel Garber and Jose Ricardo Rojas, CDG Partners LLC and MCG Properties LLC (collectively “Garber defendants”) filed a notice of motion and motion for security for costs, a supporting memorandum of points and authorities, and the supporting declaration of their counsel Thomas J. Weiss, with exhibits, including a declaration by co-counsel James D. Henderson. On January 30, 2006, plaintiff filed its memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Garber defendants’ motion, the opposing declarations of Jonathan Cooperman and Gary A. Pemberton, with exhibits, and evidentiary objections to the declarations of Weiss and Henderson. Garber defendants did not timely file a reply.

Oral argument was held before Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman on February 15, 2006. Ronald S. Hodges and Gary A. Pemberton, attorneys-at-law with the firm Shulman Hodges & Bastían, appeared on behalf of plaintiff and Thomas J. Weiss and Hyrum K. Hunt, attorneys-at-law, and James D. Henderson, Jr., attorney-at-law,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.