Frontline Medical Associates, Inc. v. Coventry Healthcare Workers Compensation, Inc.

Good Law
620 F. Supp. 2d 1109·2009 WL 1565866·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50662
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 2009CV 09-3274-GHK (AGRx)California841 words

Opinion

Opinion

King, J.

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Amended Order re: Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and OSC re: Preliminary Injunction

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Frontline Medical Associates, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and OSC re: Preliminary Injunction (“Application”) against Defendants Coventry Healthcare Workers Compensation, Inc., First Health Group Corp., and Focus Healthcare Management, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). We have considered the papers filed in support of and opposition to this Application, and we deem this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. L.R. 7-15. As the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, we will repeat them only as necessary. Accordingly, we rule as follows.

The standard for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and a preliminary injunction are the same. Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 887 F.Supp. 1320, 1323 (N.D.Cal.1995). The movant must establish: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood of irreparable harm; (3) the balance of equities tips in his favor; and (4) an injunction is in the public interest.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.