Folb

Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans

Caution
16 F. Supp. 2d 1164·1998 WL 516104·50 Fed. R. Serv. 760·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18094
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 1998CV 97-1663 RAP (CWx)California8,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO ORDER AFTER HEARING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY DEBORAH SAXE, ESQ. AND BY HADSELL & STORMER PURSUANT TO SUBPOENAS

I.

Introduction and Factual Background

Plaintiff Scott Folb contends that defendants discriminated against him on the basis of gender and retaliated against him because he objected when Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health Plans (the “Plans”) violated fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Defendants allegedly relied on a complaint that Folb had sexually harassed another employee, Vivian Vasquez, as a pretext to discharge him for his whistle-blowing activities.

The Plans allegedly promoted Folb several times while he worked for them. Folb became the Administrative Director in January 1996. After Folb took certain actions regarding Vasquez’ access to the new computer software system, Vasquez allegedly filed a complaint about his management action. Folb claims Vasquez filed her sexual harassment complaint only after she was told plaintiff had discretion to make the managerial decision about which she had initially complained.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.