Alagna

Miller v. Alagna

Good Law
138 F. Supp. 2d 1252·2000 WL 33270362
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2000ED-CV99-0176RT (RZX)California3,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PAUL BUGAR’S AND DAN HO-TARD’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY CHRISTENSEN, MILLER, FINK, JACOBS, GLASER, WEIL & SHAPIRO AND THE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF THE DEFENDANT CITY OF RIVERSIDE

The Court, the Honorable Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered: 1) Defendants, Cross-Claimants, and Counter- Claimants Paul Bugar and Dan Hotard (“Bugar” and “Hotard”)’s motion for preliminary injunction and/or motion to disqualify Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, LLP (“Christensen, Miller”) and the City Attorney’s Office of the City of Riverside (“City Attorney’s Office”), 2) Defendant Greg Preece (“Preece”) and Defendant City of Riverside (“the City”) (collectively, “Defendants”)^ opposition to Bugar and Hotard’s motion, and 3) Bugar and Hotard’s reply. Based on such consideration, the Court concludes as follows:

I.

BACKGROUND

Tyisha Miller was shot and killed by City police officers on December 28, 1998 while she was seated in a parked car at a gas station. In anticipation of a civil suit being filed by Tyisha Miller’s survivors, the City in January 1999 retained Christensen, Miller to defend the City and the individual police officers involved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.