Sarmiento

Sarmiento v. BMG ENTERTAINMENT

Good Law
326 F. Supp. 2d 1108·2003 WL 23678387·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25711
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2003CV 03-2469LGBJTLXCalifornia2,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baird, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Luis Sarmiento (“Plaintiff’ or “Sarmiento”) brings this action against Defendant BMG Entertainment (“Defendant” or “BMG”) alleging three causes of action: 1) breach of employment agreement; 2) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and 3) failure to pay wages due. By the instant motion, Defendant seeks to dismiss the action for lack of proper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). Defendant claims that the parties’ agreement contained a forum selection clause that provided for any litigation to be filed in New York, and that the forum selection clause must be enforced.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is a composer and music executive who has held various positions at BMG since 1982. Declaration of Frank Martinez (“Martinez Deck”), Ex. E (Complaint) ¶ 10. In 1990, Sarmiento was promoted to Director of Artist and Repertoire (“A & R”) of BMG Argentina. Id. In December 1999, Sarmiento and BMG entered into a written agreement for Sar-miento’s employment as Director of A & R of BMG U.S.’ Latin division. Id. ¶ 11; Martinez Deck, Ex. A. On April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.