United States v. Chemicals for Research and Industry

Good Law
10 F. Supp. 2d 1125·98 Daily Journal DAR 10514·1998 WL 400470·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10749
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 1998C 96-2382 SICalifornia3,096 words

Opinion

Opinion

Illston, J.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On February 25, 1998, the Court heard argument on plaintiffs motion for a supplemental preliminary judgment. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs motion as follows:

BACKGROUND

Defendant Chemicals for Research and Industry (“CFRI”), a chemical and laboratory supply company located in Oakland, California, has had a long and antagonistic relationship with the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (collectively “the government”). In the early 1990’s, CFRI filed two actions based on .the government’s attempts to limit CFRI’s sales of chemicals to individuals using the chemicals to manufacture methamphetamine. First, in CFRI v. Thornburgh, 762 F.Supp. 1394 (N.D.Cal.1991), the district court issued a preliminary injunction against the government, enjoining the government from notifying chemical suppliers that they should refrain from selling certain chemicals to CFRI. The government’s agents had “suspectfed] that chemicals sold by plaintiff have been diverted to use at illegal methamphetamine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.