In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas

Good Law
438 F. Supp. 2d 1111·2006 WL 2354402·34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2222·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59795
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2006CR 06-90225 JSWCalifornia5,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion to quash subpoenas filed by Mark Fainaru-Wada (“Fainaru-Wada”) and Lance Williams (“Williams”) (collectively “Movants”). Having considered the parties’ pleadings, the brief filed by Amicus Curiae, relevant legal authority, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court HEREBY DENIES the motion to quash.

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a series of articles published in the San Francisco Chronicle (the “Chronicle”), authored by movants Mark Fainaru-Wada (“Fainaru-Wada”) and Lance Williams (‘Williams”) (collectively “Movants”). The articles relate to the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative (“BALCO”), its principals, and two of its distributors (the “BALCO defendants”), and the Government’s investigation into the distribution of steroids and performance enhancing drugs to a number of prominent athletes. (See generally, Affidavit of Jonathan R. Donnellan (“Donnellan Aff.”), Exs. 1-11, 26-30, 32.) Movants began reporting on the BALCO investigation in or around October 2003. (Donnellan Aff., Ex. 1.)

On February 12, 2004, the BALCO defendants were indicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.