Boyd

Boyd v. Aetna Life Insurance

Good Law
438 F. Supp. 2d 1134·2006 WL 1851475·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47263
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 28, 2006EDCV 05-466-SGLCalifornia10,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Larson, J.

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DETERMINE STANDARD OF REVIEW

Howard Boyd has filed suit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), challenging the denial of his application for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits. Boyd brings this action against his employer, Boeing Company (“Boeing”), Boeing’s long-term disability plan (“Plan”), and the Plan’s claims administrator and insurer, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”). Currently before the Court is Boyd’s Motion to Determine the Standard for Reviewing Aetna’s denial of his application for long-term disability benefits. For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that the proper standard of review is de novo.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Boyd worked for Boeing for thirty-eight years beginning as an hourly laborer and ending as a manager, a position he held for twenty-two years. (Administrative Record (“A.R.”) at 636). In the latter position, Boyd supervised a team of workers in the tooling department and was responsible for reconciling historical records involved in the purchase of tools for government contracts, preparing records for government audits, and tracking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.