Sullins
Sullins v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
Wilken, J.
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This case is based on the allegations that, during the time Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation owned the real property now owned by Plaintiffs, underground storage tanks leaked, contaminating the property, and that Defendant refuses to contribute to the cost of remediating the property. Defendant moves for summary judgment on three of the four claims in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (TAC): (1) liability under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6972 (a)(1)(B) (RCRA Subsection B); (2) contribution; and (3) indemnity. Defendant does not seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claim for continuing nuisance. Plaintiffs oppose the motion and Defendant has replied. The motion was heard on June 10, 2010. Having consid ered oral argument and all the papers filed by the parties, the Court hereby grants, in part, the motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Carlton and Rita Sullins (the Sullinses) are the sole shareholders of Plaintiff Don-Sul, Inc., owner of the real property located at 187 N. L Street, Liver-more, California (the property). Plaintiffs purchased…