Evanston Insurance v. American Safety Indemnity Co.

Good Law
768 F. Supp. 2d 1004·2011 WL 589812·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13110
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2011C 10-01472 CWCalifornia4,108 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 20 and 21)

Plaintiff Evanston Insurance Company asserts an equitable contribution claim against Defendant American Safety Indemnity Company. Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment. Defendant opposes Plaintiffs motion and cross-moves for summary judgment that Plaintiff is not entitled to equitable contribution. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s cross-motion. The motions were taken under submission on the papers. Having considered the papers submitted by the parties, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and DENIES it in part and DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND

The parties are insurance companies with a common insured, Northern California Universal Enterprise Company (Northern Cal). Northern Cal is a developer which constructed single-family residences in Mendota, California. These homes are at issue in Ayala v. Northern California Universal Enterprise Company, No. 07CECG01000-AMS, a lawsuit pending in Fresno County Superior Court. Plaintiff seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.