Chacanaca

Chacanaca v. QUAKER OATS COMPANY

Good Law
752 F. Supp. 2d 1111·2010 WL 4055954·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111981
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2010C 10-0502 RSCalifornia8,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

Seeborg, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Robert Chacanaca and Victor Guttmann, acting on behalf of a putative class of California consumers, assert that defendant’s Chewy Bars product contains “dangerous amounts of trans fat,” but are labeled and marketed to suggest that they are in fact wholesome and healthful. Accordingly, their Complaint raises claims for false advertising under the both the Lanham Act and California law (“FAL”), violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and violations of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”). Plaintiffs do not seek damages. They instead seek an order enjoining the Quaker Oats Company (“Quaker Oats”) from including a “0 grams trans fat” statement on the Chewy Bar label, an order compelling “corrective advertising,” disgorgement of revenues, and restitution.

At the outset of this action, Quaker Oats requested a temporary stay of discovery and moved immediately for judgment on the pleadings on all of plaintiffs’ claims. It argues that the doctrines of express preemption, primary jurisdiction, and Article III standing warrant immediate dismissal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.