Salkin

Salkin v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Good Law
767 F. Supp. 2d 1062·2011 WL 554079·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16792
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2011Case EDCV 10-01322 VAP(OPx)California3,182 words

Opinion

Opinion

Phillips, J.

PROCEEDINGS: MINUTE ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND SUIT AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SUPPLEMENT OPPOSITION (IN CHAMBERS)

The Court has received and considered all papers filed in support of, and in oppo sition to, the Motion to Remand (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Marshall Salkin (“Mr. Salkin”) and Ellen Salkin (“Mrs. Salkin”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (Doc. No. 13.) The Court has also received and considered all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the Ex Parte Application to Supplement their Opposition (“Application”) filed by Defendants United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) and USAA Life Insurance Company (“USAA Life”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. No. 17.) These matters came before the Court for a hearing on January 3, 2011. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion and Defendants’ Application.

I. BACKGROUND

1. Plaintiffs’ Allegations

Plaintiffs, a husband and wife, purchased a life insurance policy in 2008 from Defendants for Mr. Salkin, naming Mrs. Salkin as the beneficiary. (See Not. of Removal, Ex. B at 6. ) Mr. Salkin received this policy after undergoing a medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.