Yumul

Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.

Good Law
733 F. Supp. 2d 1134·2010 WL 3359674·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86397
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2010Case CV 10-00927 MMM (AJWx)California4,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrow, J.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. BACKGROUND

Rebecca Yumul filed this putative class action against defendant Smart Balance, Inc. on February 8, 2010. Yumul’s complaint alleges that she purchased Nucoa margarine, a product manufactured by Smart Balance, repeatedly during the class period, from January 1, 2000 until the present.

Yumul alleges that Nucoa contains artificial trans fat, which increases the risk of coronary heart disease by raising the level of “bad” LDL blood cholesterol and lowering the level of “good” HDL blood cholesterol. Yumul also alleges that trans fat causes cancer and type 2 diabetes. Despite the ill effects of trans fat, Smart Balance markets Nucoa as “cholesterol free.” Yumul alleges that, while possibly true, this statement is misleading, since consumption of Nucoa in fact raises the level of LDL blood cholesterol. She contends that use on the product packaging of the word “healthy,” (in Spanish, “saludable”) is also misleading because of the negative health effects of trans fat.

Yumul asserts that any statute of limitations that might otherwise bar the action is tolled because she “did not discovery that SBI’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.