Castillo

Castillo v. Clark

Good Law
610 F. Supp. 2d 1084·2009 WL 811599·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24995
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2009CV 06-4111-AHM (RNB)California21,224 words

Opinion

Opinion

Matz, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, including the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ROBERT N. BLOCK, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable A. Howard Matz, United States District Judge, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and General Order 194 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

PROCEEDINGS

On June 22, 2006, petitioner lodged for filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Pet.”) herein. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.