Rosenfeld

Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
732 F. Supp. 2d 952·2010 WL 3155808·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81087
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2010C 09-6070 MEJCalifornia10,772 words

Opinion

Opinion

James, J.

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), California Reconveyance Company (“CRC”), and Bank of America, N.A.’s (“BofA”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. # 10.) After consideration of the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows.

II. BACKGROUND

In late July 2006, Plaintiff Paul E. Rosenfeld (“Plaintiff”) obtained a mortgage loan in the amount of $987,000.00 (“first loan”) in connection with the property located at 2811 Monte Cresta Drive, in Belmont, California (“the Subject Property”). (Defs.’ Mot. 1:17-18, Dkt. #10; Pl.’s Opp’n 3:16-17, Dkt. # 13.) The first loan was secured by a Deed of Trust (“first DOT”) recorded on July 27, 2006 with the San Mateo County Recorder’s Office as instrument number 2006-112029. (Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), Ex. 1, Dkt. # 11.) The first DOT of trust identifies Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”) as the lender, CRC as the trustee, and Plaintiff as the borrower. Id. Attached to the first DOT is an Adjustable Rate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.