Gant

Gant v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
765 F. Supp. 2d 1238·2011 WL 1585133·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46536
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 2011Case CV 08-5756 GAF (PJWx)California13,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feess, J.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I.

INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Kelvin Gant (“Gant”), Reginald Lenard Smith (“Smith”), and Jose Alexander Ventura (‘Ventura”) filed this putative class action against the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Police Department, the City of Chino, the Chino Police Department, the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, the City of Torrance, the Torrance Police Department, and Torrance police officers Steve Jangaard and Rod Irvine. (Docket No. 69, Third Am. Class Action Compl. (“TACC”).) Plaintiffs allege that Defendants improperly arrested them on warrants issued for other persons or improperly detained them following their improper arrests.

On October 8, 2009, the Court granted in part a motion to dismiss by the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, the City of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles Police Department. (Docket No. 94, 10/8/09 Order). The Court later also granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings on Smith’s only remaining claim. (See Docket No. 108, 2/25/10…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.