Molski

Molski v. Mandarin Touch Restaurant

Good Law
359 F. Supp. 2d 924·2005 WL 535357·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6629
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2005CV 04-450 ER, CV 03-2239 ERCalifornia7,662 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rafeedie, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 9, 2004, this Court issued an order declaring Jarek Molski a vexatious litigant and requiring him to obtain leave of court before filing any further ADA claims in the district court. 347 F.Supp.2d 860 (C.D.Cal.2004). That order and its findings with regard to Plaintiff Molski are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth. As a result of the Court’s factual investigation relating to that order, the Court issued additional orders to show cause to the Plaintiffs and attorneys in that case, as well as the Plaintiffs and attorneys in the case of Jankey v. Yang Chow Restaurant. Specifically, the Court ordered Disability Rights Enforcement Education Services: Helping You Help Others (“DREES”), a co-plaintiff in both cases, and The Frankovich Group, attorneys of record for the Plaintiffs in both cases, to show cause why the Court should not require them to seek leave of court before filing a complaint alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Further, the Court ordered DREES to show cause why its complaints should not be dismissed for a lack of standing. Finally, the Court ordered the Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.