Peviani

Peviani v. Hostess Brands, Inc.

Good Law
750 F. Supp. 2d 1111·2010 WL 4553510·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122478
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2010CV 10-2303 CBM (VBKx)California4,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marshall, J.

ORDER:

(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND

(2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

The matters before the Court are (1) Defendants Hostess Brands, Inc.’s, Interstate Brands Corporation’s, and IBC Sales Corporation’s (collectively, “Defendants”) “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim for Relief’ (“Motion to Dismiss”); and (2) “Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Each Claim Thereof’ (“Request for Judicial Notice”). [Doc. Nos. 19, 21].

JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1332,1367 and 15 U.S.C. § 1121 .

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In this putative class action, Plaintiff Victor Guttmann (“Plaintiff’) alleges that Defendants use misleading, deceptive, and fraudulent misstatements and omissions to market six (6) varieties of baked-goods products under the label “Hostess 100 Calorie Packs.” (First Amended Complaint (“First. Am. Compl.”) at ¶¶4-7, 61.) In particular, Plaintiff alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.