Chamberlan

Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co.

Good Law
314 F. Supp. 2d 953·2004 WL 615090·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11576
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2004C 03-2628 CWCalifornia6,759 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant Ford Motor Company has filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims on the ground of preemption. Plaintiffs oppose this motion. The matter was heard on October 17, 2003. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court denies Defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons residing in California who purchased certain automobiles (Subject Automobiles) manufactured by Defendant. In relevant part, the complaint alleges that, beginning in 1996, Defendant manufactured, sold, and distributed Subject Automobiles containing defective intake manifolds. Compl. at ¶ 2. Plaintiffs allege that no later than January 1, 1997, and possibly earlier, Defendant became aware that a large number of intake manifolds in the Subject Automobiles were cracking prematurely, exposing drivers and their passengers to serious risk of injury. Id. at ¶ 4. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant’s testing and records showed that the intake manifolds failed at a “much higher rate than was to be expected from a properly functioning manifold, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.