Schwarzenegger

National Ass'n of Chain Drug Stores v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
678 F. Supp. 2d 995·2009 WL 5253371·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126933
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2009Case CV 09-7097 CAS (MANx)California3,136 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snyder, J.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I. INTRODUCTION

On September 80, 2009, plaintiffs, the National Association of Chain Drug Stores (“NACDS”) and the National Community Pharmacists Associations (“NCPA”), filed the instant action. On October 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint (“FAC”) against defendants Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of the State of California; Kim Belshe, Secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency; David Maxwell-Jolly, Director the California Department of Health Care Services; and the California Department of Health Care Services (the “Department”). The Department is a California agency charged with the administration of California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal. Plaintiffs represent certain Medi-Cal pharmacy providers.

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from “reducing by, on average, slightly more than four percent (4%) Medicaid reimbursement based on Average Wholesale Price (“AWP”) for drug products paid to pharmacies for dispensing prescription drugs reimbursed” by Medi-Cal (the “AWP reductions”). FAC at 2. Plaintiffs allege that the implementation of the AWP reductions violates Title XIX of the Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.