Roe Ex Rel. Callahan v. Gustine Unified School District

Good Law
678 F. Supp. 2d 1008·2009 WL 5184688·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118880
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20091:07-CV-00796-OWW-SMSCalifornia17,253 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wanger, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE DEFENDANTS GUSTINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, JASON SPAULDING, ANTHONY SOUZA, AND ADAM CANO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 96) AND DEFENDANT CARL SCUDDER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 91.)

I. INTRODUCTION

This case arises from alleged student-on-student harassment of Plaintiff John Roe while he was attending a football camp at Liberty High School in July 2006. In July 2006, Plaintiff was an incoming freshman at Gustine High School, who intended to play football for Gustine High in the fall of 2006. Plaintiff attended a football camp jointly coordinated by Gustine and Liberty High Schools. While at football camp, Plaintiff was assaulted by several upper class teammates, and suffered additional acts of hazing by these individuals.

The defendants are the Gustine and Golden Valley Unified School Districts, Gustine High School football coaches, the individuals who allegedly perpetrated these events, and the parents of the minors allegedly involved in these events.

On May 31, 2007, Sheila Irene Callahan, as guardian ad litem for John Roe, a minor, the real party in interest, filed this action against defendants under 20 U.S.C. section 1681-1688…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.