CRV Imperial-Worthington, LP v. Gemini Insurance

Good Law
770 F. Supp. 2d 1070·2011 WL 921654·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30613
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20113:10-mj-01010California1,533 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huff, J.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

On May 12, 2010, Plaintiffs CRY Imperial-Worthington, LP, Watermark Granite La Quinta, LLC, IC-Lemoore, LP, and Innovative Communities, Inc. filed a complaint against Gemini Insurance Company (“Gemini”). (Doc. No. 1.) On May 25, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 3.) On August 4, 2010, 2010 WL 6110043 , the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 8.) On September 3, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. (Doc. No. 9.) On October 29, 2010, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Doc. No. 17.) On December 1, 2010, Plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint (“TAC”). (Doc. No. 18.) On December 13, 2010, Defendant filed its motion to dismiss the third amended complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 20.) On January 10, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 23.) On January 14, 2010, Defendant filed its reply to the opposition. (Doc. No. 24.) The Court held a hearing on the matter on January 24, 2011. Amy Simonson appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Howard Wollitz…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.