Everett Associates, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance

Good Law
141 F. Supp. 2d 989·2001 WL 388784·2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7954
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2001C-97-4308 SCCalifornia6,940 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conti, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Everett Associates, Inc. (“Everett”) and Donald Payne (“Payne”) bring the above-captioned action against Defendant insurance companies Transcontinental Insurance Company (“Transcontinental”) and American National Fire Insurance Company (“American”) for claims resulting from their refusal to defend and indemnify Plaintiff in an underlying patent infringement lawsuit.

In this third round of summary judgment motions, Defendants seek summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims for (1) negligence; (2) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (3) emotional distress damages for breach of contract; (4) indemnification; and (5) recovery of the Clark settlement as damages for breach of contract.

II. BACKGROUND

The underlying patent case, Clark v. Living Earth Crafts, No. 97-351 (C.D.Cal.1997) (the “Clark action”), involved a suit by Roland Clark against Everett, dba Living Earth Crafts, alleging that Everett advertised, offered to sell, manufactured, and sold portable massage tables that infringed a patent owned by Clark. Everett tendered the defense of this action to Defendant Transcontinental on May 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.