Nero

Nero v. Allison

Good Law
757 F. Supp. 2d 971·2010 WL 4570038·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117588
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2010Case CV 10-1103-SVW (PJW)California1,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and has considered de novo the portions of the Report as to which objections have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2); Fed. R.App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 , 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003).

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Hon. Stephen V.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.