Smith v. Ford Motor Co.

Caution
749 F. Supp. 2d 980·2010 WL 3619853·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95122
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2010C-06-00497 MMCCalifornia7,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chesney, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Court are defendant Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford”) Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Richard Smith (“Smith”), and Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Rebecca Klein (“Klein”), each filed November 17, 2008. Plaintiffs have filed a joint opposition to both motions, to which Ford has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court hereby rules as follows.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On January 25, 2006 plaintiffs filed the instant action. On September 22, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), in which plaintiffs allege that Ford unlawfully concealed information concerning the failure rate of the ignition locks in its 2000 through 2006 model year Focus vehicles, provided an unconscionable standard warranty, and maintained a secret warranty adjustment program.

An ignition lock is the vehicle part in which the key is inserted and turned to activate the ignition; its purpose is to start the car. When an ignition lock fails, the driver is prevented from turning the key. (See Declaration of Dina E. Micheletti…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.