Charles

Charles v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
757 F. Supp. 2d 989·2010 WL 4916646·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126813
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 2010Case No.: CV 10-7260 ABC (PLAx)California6,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

ORDER RE: CITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

Pending before the Court is Defendant City of Los Angeles’s (the “City’s”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief and Motion for a More Definite Statement, filed on November 11, 2010. (Docket No. 21.) Plaintiffs Wayne Charles and Fort Self Storage, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) opposed on November 15, 2010 and the City replied on November 22, 2010. This matter is set for hearing on Monday, December 6, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., but the Court finds it appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Court also VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for that day. For the reasons below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the motion for a more definite statement is DENIED as MOOT.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

A. Introduction

This is yet another case in the saga involving the City’s attempts to regulate the proliferation of commercial billboards in Los Angeles. This case, however, raises only narrow as-applied claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages based on the City’s classification of Plaintiffs proposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.