King

United States v. King

Good Law
560 F. Supp. 2d 906·2008 WL 2225683·2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44553
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 2008C 06-00658 CRBCalifornia6,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

ORDER RE: MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Defendant Shunnee King moves to suppress evidence discovered by the South San Francisco Police Department pursuant to a prostitution investigation. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the suppression motion as to a camera and notebooks discovered in the hotel room and all evidence discovered in King’s car. The motion is DENIED as to the government’s entry into the hotel room, the search of the laptop, and the government’s subsequent search of King’s home.

Background

This case arises from a sting operation of suspected prostitution activity in South San Francisco. In August of 2005, South San Francisco Police Sergeant Robert Eastman conducted an investigation into advertisements for prostitution posted on the Craigslist internet website. See Reporter’s Transcript, People v. King, No. CC 622924 (Cal.Super.Ct. Feb. 27, 2008) at SK0384 [hereinafter “RT”]. Sgt. Eastman monitored postings offering sexual services from a woman named “Stacy,” who purported to be 19 years old. RT 384-85, 437.

On August 31, 2005, Sgt. Eastman scheduled a “date” with Stacy in order to investigate whether she was violating California’s prostitution and licensing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.