Brockett

State Farm Life Insurance v. Brockett

Good Law
737 F. Supp. 2d 1146·2010 WL 3397379·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88816
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2010CIV-F-09-0356 AWI SMSCalifornia6,548 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ishii, J.

ORDER RE: RACHEL BROCKETT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. History

Plaintiff State Farm Life Insurance Company (“State Farm”) insured the life of Matthew Scott Brockett for a number of years. Rachel Botkin and Matthew Brockett married in 2002. Joshua Broekett, Danelle Brockett, Nicholas Brockett, and Kathryn Brockett (collectively the “Brockett Children”) are Matthew Brockett’s children by previous marriage. On August 7, 2006, the life insurance policy (“Policy”) was increased to $500,000, with Rachel Brockett to receive $380,000, and the Brockett Children to receive $30,000 each. Matthew and Rachel Brockett separated in early 2008. On March 11, 2008, Matthew Brockett filed for divorce. Doc. 39, Ex. C. On April 8, 2008, Matthew and Rachel Brockett signed a Marital Settlement Agreement (“MSA”). Doc. 31, Ex. D. The MSA included language concerning life insurance proceeds. On June 24, 2008, the Fresno County Superior Court entered a judgment of dissolution incorporating the MSA and specifying that Matthew and Rachel Brockett would become single persons on September 25, 2008. Doc. 31, Ex. D. Matthew Brockett obtained a change of beneficiary form for the Policy on July 25, 2008. Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.