Endsley

Endsley v. Luna

Good Law
750 F. Supp. 2d 1074·2010 WL 3118584·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79233
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2010CV 06-6961 DSF (SS)California16,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fischer, J.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 , the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.

2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .

3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims under state law.

4. Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.

5. Plaintiffs claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are DISMISSED as moot.

6. Judgment shall be entered in favor of the Defendants and against Plaintiff on the entire Complaint. Plaintiffs entire Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice.

7. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.