Felker

Jackson v. Felker

Good Law
729 F. Supp. 2d 1165·2010 WL 3081307·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74624
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2010Case CV 07-3982-GAF(RC)California7,172 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feess, J.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing the action with prejudice.

This Court finds an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2) and Fed. R.App. P. 22(b). Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483 , 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Mayfield v. Calderon, 229 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir.2000). Thus, IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.