Haugen

Haugen v. Marshall

Good Law
740 F. Supp. 2d 1150·2010 WL 3747082·2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98965
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2010Case CV 09-8044-ODW (MLG)California5,431 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and all of the records herein, including the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendations to which objections were filed.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Court accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation, (2) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED, and (3) Judgment be entered granting the petition and ordering that the California Board of Parole Hearings credit Petitioner’s parole period for the time he spent in confinement that was in violation of his due process rights.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on all parties.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Richard Haugen filed this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , on November 3, 2009. He alleges that his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated when Governor Arnold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.