Amini Innovation Corp. v. KTY International Marketing

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT KTY INTERNATIONAL MARKETING dba M PACIFIC FURNITURE [50]

I. Introduction

On September 4, 2010, Plaintiff Amini Innovation Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “AICO”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture. The motion was originally set for a hearing on February 7, 2011. The Court found the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Local Rule 7-15.

For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture is GRANTED IN PART. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED against Defendant KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture in the total amount of $176,427.66.

II. Facts

Amini Innovation Corporation (“AICO”) initiated this action against Collezione Europa U.S.A., Inc. (“Collezione”), KTY International Marketing dba M Pacific Furniture (“Defendant”), Fine Living Furniture (“FLF”), and Tom’s Farms on July 26, 2007, alleging copyright infringement (Count I) and design patent infringement (Count II). AICO is a designer and marketer of home…